Comparison of the Ideas of Jane Jacobs and Oscar Newman in Their Essay

coincidence of the Ideas of Jane Jacobs and Oscar Newman in Their Approach to Safety and Security in Urban Neighborhoods and City Centers - Essay ExampleThe head of defensible set originated out of the ideas of Jane Jacobs in 1961 and was further developed by Oscar Newman in 1973 (Greenberg et al, 1982). Both Jacobs and Newman finally argued in favor of creating boundaries in urban neighborhoods for crime prevention strategies, although in slightly different ways. Jacobs is more often than not credited with articulating the eyes on the street theory of crime prevention in urban neighborhoods, bit Newman is credited with expanding upon Jacobs theory and developing what has come to be known as defensible space (Carmona, et al, 2010, p. 151). Essentially, Jacobs argued that keeping our eyes on the street provides a significant remedy for keeping our streets and neighborhoods safer and more secure. Newman utilise the term defensible space to expound upon Jacobs theory and argued t hat the infrastructure of urban argonas with high-rise buildings created risk because people who occupied these places were helpless to defend, identify, see their entire property. Eradicating fear of crime and prevention crime was indeed solved by creating boundaries that segregated the streets from the streets (Carmona, et al, 2010). Thus both Jacobs and Newman contributed to the theory that urban design is a worth(predicate) method for reducing the fear of crime and preventing crime in urban neighborhoods by recognizing and responding to the idea of creating boundaries between areas that were in close proximity to high crime areas the city. Jacobs (1961) proposed that by increasing neighborhood participation at the street level would help residents to control their surrounding streets. The rationale for this theory was that the more eyes say toward the streets would act as a deterrent to crime. Jacobs (1961) argued that placing bright lights on streets is not enough unless th ere are eyes trained on the area.