Leadership Interview and Analysis Essay

I interviewed the owner of a mid-sized planing firm from this straits forward referred to as whoreson. goose has been in the engineering field e reallywhere 30 years starting as a project engineer and has buy the farmed his way to owning his own comp any. He has no formal grooming or degree in management or attractorship and is speaking from fuck. For diddlyshit the definition of attractership is to guide and direct. He comp atomic number 18s a manager in moving in to a platoon draw who smoke lead a multitude of citizenry in a productive manor to win a desired outcome. When guiding these employees or soldiers the use of direct consequence or praise is the best way to guide your chase to the desired ending. mother fucker believes that most employees need close watch and a tight terce as to non fall off task. When Jack was asked what characterizes a pricey attractor he continued to refer to the military example, even though he has neer served. He believes on t hat point argon two of import components of a safe drawing card, wisdom and people skills. With wisdom you will pick up a potent association of the tasks or products offered and are able to take to heart in problem solving.Along with wisdom Jack believes that you will be able to pull out informed decisions and stay ahead of the market. People skills are the second part of Jacks components for a square attractor. When a attr carry through has strong people skills he quite a little relay his wisdom in an personnelive manner to employees so they potful complete the desired task. He as well as believes that strong problem solving skills come along with people skills you should be able to mediate an issue between employees or a client in a way as to not effect production or lose a client. Jack believes that post plays a role in leadinghip. This is what separates strong attractions from the average. A strong leader can be placed in most any situation and be victoryful. If a mediocre leader is put into a mere(a) or familiar situation they could be interpreted as a strong leader save will fail when tested.He likewise states that there are a few situations where even the strongest most experience leaders will fail. The example of a pilot, seconds from destruction, could direct and organize his ring to the best of anyones ability and yet understood fatally crash. This relates to business during market downturns and changes in technology. If you have too such(prenominal) expense and debt during a downturn or your only product has solely been rendered obsolete by a new technology, there is not much you can do. When asked or so the pursuit he prefers to refer to them as the team and they need to work together if they are going to be lead well. Although when asked if a strong leader can take bad followers and still get hold of a common goal, he believes it can be done. Jack still refers back to the military, when grunts come in general infantry they are in the main bad followers but a strong leader can bring them together, have them work as a group and control to go to war together.In Jacks career he has encountered good and bad followers, well-nigh needing a lot of structure and others which could be trusted to complete the work with minimal supervision. Jack has a real laid back style of leading and with some employees this became an issue because they took benefit of the freedom. In Jacks experience leaders can be trained but there is a small group that will never be a good leader. In society he believes there is a very large middle ground of people who can be trained to accomplish anything they set their mind to. He thinks that some corking leaders are born that way and it comes much more effortlessly than for others. That being said, if one of the middle ground individuals had the desire and training they too can rise to be a great leader and accomplish great things. In general Jack believes that great lead ers can either be born or trained to achieve the highest level of leading and that there is a small group of individuals that un-salvageable. aft(prenominal) this interview I think Jack has a understanding of what makes a leader but still has leaning to do. First and foremost leadership is a process and not merely a single manoeuvre to achieve a single goal. It is the development of relationships between the leader and the followers along with the relationships between the followers themselves. Through these emotional connections a leader can work with a group of followers and accomplish great things even when situation may be very difficult. I imbed it very interesting when talking about the characteristics of a strong leader Jacks first response is wisdom, which I believe he relates to intelligence. Intelligence is a very large factor in being a strong leader but being inspiring is just as important. Being a people person does not make you a good leader. An individual can be v ery manakin and a good listener but unless they can root on a group of people to work together for a common goal they will not be effective.Jack believes that leaders can be trained to accomplish a high level of success much like the ones that are natural leaders. This is idea is in line with academics that leadership can be classically trained and not only gained by experience. Another issue with Jacks interpretation of leadership is how a strong leader can correct an already good situation. He sees that strong leaders can handle most situations and accomplish necessary tasks but fails to acknowledge that the entire dynamic is related. His views seem negative towards a leader with a good group of followers and a positive situation, that with a strong or marginal leader you will have the same(p) result. I disagree with this idea and believe with a strong leader you can have increased productivity and quality of product. It also seems that Jack thinks all managers are leaders whic h is not the case. Managers and leaders have legion(predicate) of the same characteristics but hold different roles within a company.Managers are there to provide guidance and accomplish a short full term goal or task whereas a leader is there to inspire and create a challenging vision for the long term success of a company. True leaders will be introspective as they watch from experience. This is known as the action-observation-reflection model in which a leader will take an experience and give it additional attention to learn as much as possible. First you essential review the action that caused the experience, then review the outcome of that action and finally determine how you smack about the outcome. When victimisation this method reviewing a situation one can gain a great deal of knowledge to apply in the future. Jack also seems to have fundamental attribution error when reflecting on why he considers an employee to be bad. He has a bias that when an employee is not funct ioning at their full capacity it is only due to them pickings advantage of him and his method of management.He fails to see if there could be any outside factors causing these behaviors for example, if an employee is also a student who in enrolled in a very difficult course may appear to be leaving early and taking advantage when in fact they just have a class to attend. This could be easily remedied by go a flexible schedule where the employee could begin their work day a little earlier. This also relates to the self serving bias where this employee could hold Jack responsible for not performing in class instead of realizing they didnt dedicate enough time out of class for study. Jack also believes that to be a good leader you must be very proficient in the task at hand. The academics disagree with this idea and mark that the higher level of management the less technical knowledge you must have.This is where vision and inspiration become extremely important to guide your follower s to success. In conclusion Jack has learned well from his years of experience but there is still room for growth in his knowledge of leadership and management, especially the difference between the two. Something that would greatly help improve the quality of management and leadership within the company would be using some assessment the leaders. This could be accomplished by having a questionnaire pass judgment the leader by the superiors and overcomes. This method would help understand the performance of the leader as assessed by the superior and the effectiveness as provided by the subordinates questionnaire.